US foreign policy would be characterized in the
turn of the twentieth century by the policies of three presidents; Theodore
Roosevelt “Big Stick Diplomacy”, William Taft “Dollar Diplomacy” and Woodrow
Wilson “Moral Diplomacy. All of them shared similar characteristics and also
differ in many ways, but all the three defended American interests, increased
American influence and backed up American business overseas.
Theodore Roosevelt “Big Stick Diplomacy” was
based on the idea of “speak softly and carry a big stick”; he believed that the
US should become a world power and that it was necessary to carry out actions
to demonstrate the US intentions. Not only Roosevelt believed that it was
necessary to show a hard power but also it was important to export American
values and ideals (democracy, freedom, culture). Consequently Roosevelt’s
actions were very aggressive reflecting his “Big Stick Diplomacy”. For example
the US had interest in building a canal in Central America, its options were
Nicaragua and Panama after Nicaragua was ruled out, Panama became the priority,
and in 1903 revolted against Colombia with the support of the United States
Navy, becoming a new republic and gaining their independence, with this action the
United States gained perpetual control of the canal. Roosevelt’s approach to
Latin America was based on the Monroe Doctrine “America for the Americans” he
acted on behalf of Venezuela when British and German ships blockade its
costliness, acted on behalf of Dominican Republic to avoid European
intervention. To show American power he increased the US Navy size, and in 1907
commanded the fleet to go on a world tour to show its power. But he also showed
a face of mediator in the Russo-Japanese war and between France and Germany for
the control of Morocco.
On the other hand William Taft “Dollar
Diplomacy” was based on buying alliances, expanding trade and protecting US
business overseas. The initial idea of the dollar diplomacy was to give out
loans to countries in debt and in this order of ideas the US would control
those countries economy, increasing trade with the US, consequently by increasing
trade Taft believed that values and ideals could be exported and American
influence would increase. Taft invited US banks to rescue Honduras and other
countries, he send troops overseas to stabilize Nicaragua; he protected
American overseas business, but eventually Taft’s policies were not backed up
the congress neither by the Latin American countries.
Wilson’s foreign policy was based on moral
principles rather than commercial or military ones. Democracy should be exported around the world
and the improvement of the relationships with Latin America needed to be
immediately. His most important
contribution to the international system was his fourteen points which resemble
a moral attitude and approach to world politics, also the establishment of the
League of Nations in order to guarantee the political and territorial
independence of all states and to avoid a war similar to the world war I.
It’s evident that these foreign policies shaped
the US in the turn of the twentieth century and stills holds up a big impact on
today’s foreign policy, first of all I want to mention that the US exile from
isolation and entered the role of a world power. Furthermore these policies
shaped American foreign policy during the next years, in World War II, Cold War
and war on terror. If we look at American influence over the years, it has
intervened military in many conflicts around the world (Europe, the Pacific,
Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Nicaragua and Iraq) it has also exported its ideals
and values of democracy and freedom for example Philippines and countries
behind the iron curtain. And finally it has developed economic tides in order
to gather alliances we can see this in the Plan Colombia.
Bibliografía
Beck, M. W.
(1997). Big Stick Diplomacy: The Politics of the Panama Canal. Houston .
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario